All in the name of competition

14 February 2010 7 Comments

Please don’t talk to me about the Olympics. I find the news coming out of there horrific and incomprehensible. Actually, we can talk about Lindsey Vonn and the way the media is enabling her idiocy. There is nothing “brave” or “admirable” or about someone saying, “Gosh, you know, I just don’t want to face reality.”—I’m synthesizing and paraphrasing here, obviously—“Didn’t that little gymnast compete on a broken ankle? Sure, she was competing in an event where the impact to the ankle was minimal and risk could be mitigated, and I’m competing in a sport where I need to place extreme pressure on both legs, but I’d hate to get an xray and find out I have a fracture. It’d be much more romantic for my leg to shatter halfway down the course—won’t the papers call me a trooper and awesome athlete then?!”

Actually, what she said was, “I don’t know that it’s not broken. My physio that was there [in Austria] wanted me to get a X-ray and I refused to get one. I pretty much stuck my fingers in my ear and just pretended like I didn’t hear what was going on. I didn’t want to hear that my shin was fractured because, at the time, that’s what it looked like.”

God, I’m glad we pick our athlete-heroes wisely. What an awesome poster-child.

The stuff you see oozing out of your screen right now? That’s sarcasm.

We have reached a point in sports where athletes are risking their lives on course if they make a mistake, and we justify this because “they’ll die doing what they love.” I’ll buy that sort of risk-taking rhetoric for Joe Smith who goes and climbs Everest alone in a blizzard, but in an organized sports setting, someone has to be responsibility for safety.

And it sure as hell won’t be the athletes. What athlete ever said, “Uh—this doesn’t look safe. I’ll just sit this one out. Y’all go on and compete for fame and glory. I’ll be waiting when you get back.”

They don’t say that. They don’t make that decision. They enter the competition at all costs, no matter what injuries—diagnosed or stupidly kiss-and-make-it-bettered (Vonn)—they have. Because they’re athletes and they compete and this drive to maybe kill themselves is all about their own desire to succeed and not at all about public pressure. And the public pressure it not at all driven by a social fascination with chills and thrills. The new stuff oozing out of your monitor? Cynicism.

And—you know—let’s go to the luge.

Right after Nodar Kumaritashvili died, the existing concerns of the lugers were all over the place—they had been questioning the safety of the track, speeds were much faster than anticipated, and even top-notch athletes—like the defending champion—were crashing. And now? “Oh, gosh, you know, the athletes have had time to review things, and they agree it was pilot error, and they are now fully convinced the track is safe.”

I am sure no one sat the teams down and said, “Look, voicing your concerns about the safety of the track is hurting the Olympic image. You are the best of the best, and you are supposed to march out there and compete. With a smile on your face! Here are some numbers; allow them to override your actual impression from running down the track. It’s a shame about Kumaritashvili’s death, but after all, he died doing what he loves. And he made a mistake. Now go race for your country, mother, and apple pie—and shut up about safety!”

If you think that conversation didn’t happen, in some form or other—formal or not—you’re an idiot.

Have you noticed the news reports have done a complete 180, from doom and gloom and “what is going on there?” to butterflies and roses? You think that isn’t PR?

And Kumaritashvili is dead because of pilot error, and everyone is accepting that. Just like that. Gosh, it’s a shame, but what can you do?

I get that life is risky, and elite sports are elite for a reason. I could kill myself on a horse, in my car, or by stumbling over something in my apartment and hitting my head just right. By the time you get to the elite levels of competition, you know (or should know) your sport very well. And that includes the risk you take every time you step into your sport’s competitive ground. There is always the chance that one mistake can kill you.

That doesn’t make the combination of “race at all costs” and “create the toughest, riskiest courses possible” anything to praise and admire. I think the current stories coming out of the Olympics are symptomatic of something happening in sports everywhere. Maybe it shows a lack of something in me that means I will never be an elite competitor. Maybe I just can’t/don’t understand. Whatever it is, I find the direction elite sports is moving in appalling and incomprehensible. It makes me not want to reach the top levels of competition, any competition.

And it definitely, unquestionably, without any doubt makes me not want to watch the Olympics. The glitzy show can go on without me. I’m sure they’ll never notice I’m gone.

Inane and Mundane

Comments

There are 7 comments for this entry. Add yours.

Jane says 15 February 2010

I had the same reaction: they are not admitting to making a nearly impossible course to run, or a mistake in the ice.  And when other athletes that use the track started speaking up, and backing down, I thought “they’ve been told: Kumaritashvili’s Mistake Caused A Terrible Accident, and off the record; the profile of the ice/track will be changed, so shut up if you want to compete.”

I get too, that as an athlete, you get that far - The Olympics - and your denial mechanism kicks in; youve worked for this your whole life, what if it really was an accident?  You want to believe it was. I can see it would be hard to stay grounded in your actual experience on that track, and walk away from your shot at something big.

The track designer should be required to do the first run. 

The “I don’t want to know if it’s broken”, that I don’t get.

Marissa says 15 February 2010

I agree (though I speak fluent sarcasm and cynicism).  What kind of message are we sending to younger competitors?  Risk everything in the name of winning?  Ignore potentially life-threatening injuries or dangerous conditions because it might stand in the way of fame and glory?  Ignore your instincts to preserve the public image?  It’s just not right.

SprinklerBandit says 17 February 2010

I don’t have TV (or internet at home), so I guess I’m really out of the loop. That skier sounds like an idiot. Skiing is dangerous enough without a broken leg. What is she trying to prove?

I know accidents happen at all levels and the risk of a catastrophic accident is obviously much higher when traveling at higher speeds on faster tracks, but weren’t the competitors already objecting to the speed of that track? And who thought it was a good idea to have exposed columns next to a track? Dimwits.

I do like to watch some of the stuff, but I do not understand this complete glorification of sport. At some point, we all just need to read a book. Engage the mind; it’s part of you too.

Christy214 says 19 February 2010

Good posting. The olympics are wonderful but no need to risk your life…that curve had a lot of accidents prior to the death; so much that it was called the 50/50 curve b/c of chances. They refused to put up a wooden wall beforehand (it was requested by many teams)because they had already sold tickets to the corner and refused to pad the cement pillars because that too would hinder the view of the sold tickets. I agree with the luge athlete that said, “What are they selling tickets for, to watch crash test dummies?!” Very sad.

GoLightly says 27 February 2010

“What athlete ever said,

Halt Near X says 28 February 2010

GoLightly, no gunfire from me!

I’ll have to go look up the BMO Nations Cup. And I am sure there are other athletes who have made similar stands. Very few things in life are absolutes.

As far as the thrill-seekers (and givers)—absolutely. I think Vonn’s decision was stupid. She and her doctors thought it was a calculated one worth taking. She has an Olympic Gold and I do not. There’s a reason for that and I can understand—even if I don’t like—why the media loves these sorts of stories.

But I think if we have this atmosphere where athletes and viewers want bigger, badder, tougher courses, and the media is rewarding the ones who take big risks, we owe it to everyone involved not to sweep tragedies under the rug when they happen.

It would be very bad for all sports to try to micro-manage and eliminate all risk. Without that risk/thrill, we might as well just make the Olympics another Wii game and hand out remotes to all the athletes. I get that; I really, really do. But I still hate how quickly everyone jumps to “not our fault!” when something goes wrong.

And actually, given what I’ve read since then, I think what I really hate is the media coverage. I suspect that behind the scenes things were a lot more reasoned, rational, and thoughtful than the news outlets made it sound. They usually are.

Cut-N-Jump says 2 March 2010

In reading through all of this and the comments I recall the one year at the Scottsdale Arabian show, it had rained heavily to the point of show managment deciding to put up an arena in the parking lot, dump a bunch of dirt on the pavement and hold the jumping classes there.

As long as the classes were offered- they did not have to refund any entry fees. If you chose to scratch from the class- that was your call and you were out the money.  Only after several of the trainers with a number of students and horses complained at the show office and threatened to pull all of their horses for the remainder of the show, did show managment seek an alternative. Classes were held in one of the covered arenas.

Add Your Comment

Remember me?

Notify me when others comment?